. .
.
Effects of Carrying Capacity and Satiation in Predator-Prey Dynamics
.
.

 

Objective

 

1)   To understand the basic definitions of carrying capacity, satiation and how they relate to each other on an actual field.

 

2)   Understanding how these dynamics could be implemented with the help of mathematical equations.

 

Carrying capacity: The maximum sustainable limit by the environment, either it is population density or the food sources.

 

Satiation: This can be explained with respect to predation rate. Predator/prey on reaching satiation indicates that they are saturated and no tendency to hunt more.

 

Consider a real field scenario, wherein snakes hunt frogs. The environment in which these predator/prey species exist has a specific carrying capacity. The frogs can grow at a specific growth rate and only can reach up to the carrying capacity for the frogs in that environment. If the frog population grows beyond that, then their population would be wiped out as all the available food resources would have been consumed. The most limiting factor in  nature is the food resource. The intrinsic growth rate of the prey population is controlled by predators. The prey species has to add the number of prey individuals equal to the number of prey individuals that have been removed by the predator. If they cannot maintain this balance, then both the species will become extinct.

 

Having said that, let us look into the example of snakes hunting down frogs. The snakes would hunt down at its maximum predation rate when it feels very hungry. Hungriness is the driving force for the maximum predation rate, which we refer to here as satiation. The rate of snakes hunting down frogs depends on the carrying capacity of the frogs in that environment. Imagine that frogs have a very high carrying capacity, which means that the probability for the snake to hunt down frogs would increase. On the contrary, it will have less probability to hunt down. In the former case, the snake can reach its maximum predation rate very easily and in the latter case, it cannot be reached rather easily. On the other way around if you see, the snake can become easily satiated in the former case while in the latter case, it does not become satiated that easily. So, carrying capacity plays a very important role in regulation the satiation factor in the predators.

 

While considering satiation parameter in the predator, another important factor needs to be considered. The predator on reaching satiation may not hunt down the prey, but can store the prey for future consumption. Considering all these dynamics, imagine that you would like to increase the population density of a certain snake species. The next obvious thing for achieve this is to increase the frog species population in that environment. You can simulate these dynamics using mathematical equations to test before proceeding to the actual field.

 

Here are two different scenarios:

 

1)   Increasing prey carrying capacity when the predator is not satiated.

 

2)   Increasing prey carrying capacity when the predator is satiated.

 

We use the same logistic equations for the prey and predator as like in previous simulators. The prey dynamics is regulated by the equation:

 

«math xmlns=¨http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML¨»«mi»d«/mi»«mi»n«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»=«/mo»«mi»r«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»*«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mfrac»«mrow»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«/mrow»«mi»K«/mi»«/mfrac»«msup»«mo»)«/mo»«mrow»«mi»t«/mi»«mi»h«/mi»«mi»e«/mi»«mi»t«/mi»«mi»a«/mi»«/mrow»«/msup»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»a«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«/math»

 

Likewise, for the predator the below equation is used:

 

«math xmlns=¨http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML¨»«mi»d«/mi»«mi»n«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«mo»=«/mo»«mi»b«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»a«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»d«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«/math»

 

Wherein, r refers to rate of growth,

 

N1 is the initial population density of prey,

 

N2 is the initial population density of predator,

 

K is the carrying capacity of the prey,

 

a is the number of encounters resulted in kill,

 

b is the amount of prey converted to predator and

 

d is the death rate of the predator.

 

Using these equations for prey and predator we simulate the condition wherein the predator does not become satiated. For predator that does not become satiated no modifications are required in the classical logistic equations for predator and prey.

 

While for the predator that does become satiated, they do require modification and addition of extra parameters to the prey and predator logistic equations. The logistic prey equation in this case looks in the following way:

 

«math xmlns=¨http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML¨»«mi»d«/mi»«mi»n«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»=«/mo»«mi»r«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»*«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mfrac»«mrow»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«/mrow»«mi»K«/mi»«/mfrac»«msup»«mo»)«/mo»«mrow»«mi»t«/mi»«mi»h«/mi»«mi»e«/mi»«mi»t«/mi»«mi»a«/mi»«/mrow»«/msup»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»c«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mi mathvariant=¨normal¨»exp«/mi»«mo»(«/mo»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»a«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mfrac»«mrow»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«/mrow»«mi»c«/mi»«/mfrac»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«/math»

 

In the above equation, there’s an additional parameter called “c” was added which is called the satiation value for the predator. The parameter c is set by the user in the online simulator using a slider bar provided. ‘Theta’ refers to the spatial distribution of the individuals within an environment.

 

The modified logistic predator equation in this case looks in the following way:

 

«math xmlns=¨http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML¨»«mi»d«/mi»«mi»n«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«mo»=«/mo»«mi»b«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»c«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mo»(«/mo»«mn»1«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mi mathvariant=¨normal¨»exp«/mi»«mo»(«/mo»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»a«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mfrac»«mrow»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»1«/mn»«/mrow»«mi»c«/mi»«/mfrac»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»)«/mo»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«mo»-«/mo»«mi»d«/mi»«mo»*«/mo»«mi»N«/mi»«mn»2«/mn»«/math»

 

By this time you should be quite aware of all the parameter definitions. Using these two modified logistic equations for predator and prey, we can simulate the condition wherein the predator does become satiated.

 

Try changing the carrying capacity for the prey and observe the simulated graphs and note down the differences for the predator that does not become satiated and the predator that does become satiated.

 

 

 

Developed under a Research grant from NMEICT, MHRD
by
Amrita CREATE (Center for Research in Advanced Technologies for Education),
VALUE (Virtual Amrita Laboratories Universalizing Education)
Amrita University, India 2009 - 2014
http://www.amrita.edu/create

Downloaded from : http://amrita.vlab.co.in/?sub=3&brch=67&sim=775&cnt=1
.....
..... .....

Copyright @ 2014 Under the NME ICT initiative of MHRD

 Powered by Amrita Virtual Lab Collaborative Platform [ Ver 00.3.2 ]